https://earlymusicreview.com

early music review – The home of HIP opinionearly music review – The home of HIP opinion Skip to the content Search early music reviewThe home of HIP opinion Menu Home ARTICLES ABOUT CONTACT Search Search for: Close search Close Menu Home ARTICLES ABOUT CONTACT Categories Recording Josquin II. Missa l’ami Baudichon – motets milanais Post author By EMR2015 Post date November 13, 2026 No Comments on Josquin II. Missa l’ami Baudichon – motets milanais Cut Circle, directed by Jesse Rodin65:41Musique de Wallonie MEW 2514 ‘His talent was so versatile in every way, so equipped by a natural acumen and vigour, that there was nothing in this field which he could not do …’ Thus the Swiss humanist and theorist Heinrich Glarean, writing of Josquin in 1547, during the course of one of the earliest detailed assessments of a composer. At the heart of that output lies the attribution of 31 masses, though fewer than twenty have been authenticated as the work of Josquin. The four-voice Missa L’ami Baudichon is one of the earlier Josquin masses. It may possibly date from the period Josquin was in Milan in the service of Cardinal Ascanio Sforza (two periods between 1484 and 1489, the latter the year in which we subsequently find him in the pay of the Sistine Chapel as a singer. As the title suggests, the Mass is founded on a popular song, in this case following what was apparently a trend during this period to use a bawdy song as the cantus firmus, which, as usual, is heard throughout in the tenor line. In this case the song is particularly bawdy, making use of the ‘c’ word twice. The performance by the Belgian one-voice-per-part ensemble Cut Circle is one of a series devoted to Flemish polyphony, with CDs of music by Ockeghem, Dufay and anonymous masses issued to date. In his note, director Jesse Rodin speaks of the sensuality of the music on the disc, which also includes a chanson-motet cycle Que vous ma dame and Vultum tuum deprecabuntur, the latter in particular following the pattern of similar works identified with Milanese compositions. There is indeed a raw energy about the performances that places them far from the ecclesiastical ambiance of performances by such as the Tallis Scholars, yet that sensuality is also present in the long melismatic lines so favoured by Josquin at this stage of his compositional career. The opening Kyrie, for example, weaves sinuous lines, the voices working in pairs much of the time, the four-part writing richly expressive. Quite apart from the distinctive character of the performances, this is a rare and rewarding glimpse of the young Josquin. Brian Robins Tags Choral music, Renaissance, Vocal music Categories Recording Pasquini: Il Mosè Post author By EMR2015 Post date October 21, 2026 No Comments on Pasquini: Il Mosè Weser-Renaissance Bremen74:30cpo 555 642-2 Born in what is now Massa e Cozzile in Tuscany in 1637, Bernardo Pasquini spent his life as an organist and composer in Rome, where he became, with Corelli, a member of the famous Arcadian Academy in 1706. A noted harpsichord player and teacher, he numbered Francesco Gasparini and the German composers J. P. Krieger and Georg Muffat among his pupils. Closely associated with the Roman aristocracy, including the self-exiled Queen Christina of Sweden, who appointed him her ‘Principe della musica’, Pasquini lived from around 1669 until his death in 1710 at the Borghese Palazzo Nuovo, working in the service of Prince Giambattista Borghese and other members of the Roman nobility. His seventeen extant operas were performed at the palaces of the Colonna and Pamphili families in addition to the Tordimona and Apolloni theatres. In addition to operas, Pasquini also composed 13 or 14 oratorios, according to which source is consulted, of which seven survive today. Regrettably, cpo’s extensive notes provide no background details to I fatti di Mosè nel deserto (to give the full name of the publication), being almost entirely devoted to Christina’s admittedly interesting life after she settled in Rome in 1655. However, thanks to the extensive notes for a rival version on Da Vinci Classics – they can be read online – we learn that the oratorio was first given in Modena in 1687, one of seven oratorios commissioned by the Duke of Modena from various composers covering the life of Moses. Pasquini’s contribution is concerned with Moses and the Israelites in the desert following the flight from Egypt. In the first of the two parts – the customary design of 17th-century oratorios – thanks are given to God for the safekeeping of His chosen people, while in the second they are attacked by an enemy, Amalek, but led to victory by Joshua. The arias are mostly cast in a brief, simple ABA structure (but not yet the da capo form introduced around this time by Alessandro Scarlatti) and, as in Pasquini’s operas, a significant number have only continuo accompaniment. In addition, there is a single duet for Moses and his father-in-law Jethro, while each part concludes with a chorus. The scoring is for four-part strings, and Weser-Renaissance have opted for single strings-per-part (as does the Da Vinci version), but it seems to me that a small string ensemble would be perfectly appropriate. The oratorio is a capable, efficient piece of work though hardly to my mind compelling listening. Like the only opera of Pasquini’s with which I’m familiar, L’Idalma (Palazzo Capranico, Rome, 1680), the principal drawback is a lack of memorable melodic invention, with one aria succeeding another in quick succession without leaving any significant mark. That may, in part at least, be down to a performance that, although capable in a basic way, is like the work itself, hardly memorable. The role of Moses, originally intended for a castrato, is sung by a soprano, Magdalena Podkoscielna, whose bright, piping voice hardly suggests the dignified authority of the prophet. Much the best of the four singers is the fine tenor Georg Poplutz, who takes the role of Testo, or narrator. His diction is also superior to that of his three colleagues, but although the singing is in general competent enough, it is plain, being largely unadorned by added ornamentation; the arrival of cadence after cadence with little or no attempt at decoration becomes somewhat tedious. The instrumental playing is fine, though as is usual these days the continuo chittarone is at times too obtrusive. I have not heard the Da Vinci version in full, but anyone whose interest in I fatti di Mosè nel deserto has been aroused might find it worth checking it out before investing in this very average performance. Brian Robins Tags Baroque, Chamber music, Vocal music Categories Recording Beethoven op 59 no 3, op 95, Grosse Fuge Post author By EMR2015 Post date October 15, 2026 No Comments on Beethoven op 59 no 3, op 95, Grosse Fuge Chiaroscuro Quartet 66:52BIS BIS-2728 This is the follow-up to which I referred in the review of the first two ‘Razumovsky’ quartets. It not only completes opus 59, but adds two works that are among Beethoven’s most challenging for player and listener alike – the String Quartet in F minor op 95, and the Grosse Fuge, op 133. The earlier review drew attention to the radical nature of the opus 59 quartets, which were met with puzzlement by many of Beethoven’s contemporaries, his early biographer Alexander Thayer recording the verdict of an Italian musician who bluntly observed to Beethoven that ‘he surely did not consider these works to be music’. Beethoven’s response, ‘Oh, they are not for you, but for a later age!’ is not only an excellent riposte but – for his time – interesting evidence of an artist recognising the role of posterity in evaluating their work. That said, the final work of the set, the Quartet in C major, is undoubtedly the ‘friendliest’ of the three, a work above all characterised by the infectious ebullience in its outer movements. In fact I think it is possible to argue that the Chiaroscuros are a little too exuberant, since their tempo in these movements sounds to me just a little rushed, although checking on the timings of the Narratio Quartet, the principal rival for a period instrument performance, reveals that the difference in timings is not that great. But the playing of the introductory Andante con moto is wonderfully intense, revealing to the full its somewhat mysterious character. The following movement, which has the same marking, includes playing of the greatest refinement and delicacy, while the Haydnesque third movement, significantly marked Menuetto rather than the more modern scherzo, is given a nimble elegance. The Quartet in F minor was composed in 1810, a particularly difficult year for Beethoven during the course of which he expressed suicidal thoughts in a letter to a friend. The name ‘Serioso’ given it is not a nickname but an addition by Beethoven to the manuscript score. It is apt because the work builds on the abrupt unison opening to become a furiously uncompromising cry of desperation, of resilience. But above all, the quartet, which owes no allegiance or comparison with any other quartet by Beethoven, shouts defiance. Much of the writing is extraordinarily powerful and dense, for here Beethoven has burst open the boundaries of the quartet as surely as Monteverdi did the madrigal two hundred years earlier. These orchestral sonorities are superbly realised by the Chiaroscuros, who bring to them an impressively full-bodied commitment perhaps best illustrated by the tripartite final movement, the depth of the opening Larghetto expressivo developing restlessly through to a furious virtuoso conclusion. If Beethoven’s transformation of the string quartet can be experienced in the new sonorities he introduced to it then the most striking example of all is the ‘Grosse Fuge’, op 133. As many readers will doubtless know, this massive demonstration of contrapuntal power was not originally a stand-alone work, but the final movement of the String Quartet in B flat, op 130, first heard in Vienna on 21 March 1826. Described by one critic as ‘incomprehensible’ it appears that Beethoven quickly recognised that the movement stood in danger of swamping all that preceded it and therefore composed a lighter dance-like movement to replace it. Even more than the F-minor Quartet, Beethoven here takes no prisoners, building what even today remains for many an overwhelming and impenetrable edifice. The playing and strength of the Chiaroscuros is phenomenal, setting the seal on another supremely successful chapter in their traversal of the quartets. Brian Robins Tags Chamber music, Romantic Categories Recording Beethoven: String Quartets op 59, 1 & 2 Post author By EMR2015 Post date October 13, 2026 No Comments on Beethoven: String Quartets op 59, 1 & 2 Chiaroscuro Quartet 77:31BIS BIS-2688 Although I’m not aware of any announcement to the effect, this release and a disc to hand (to be reviewed shortly) containing the third of the opus 59 ‘Razumovsky’ Quartets and opus 95 in F minor would seem to confirm that the Chiaroscuro Quartet are making their way toward a complete cycle. If so, it will make for a fascinating contrast with another period instrument intégrale by the Narratio Quartet. A review of the Narratios own set of opus 59 can be found on this site. The string quartet has often been considered the medium that offers the greatest challenge to composers. The three composers that form not only the string quartet’s foundations but also its apogée – Haydn, Mozart and Beethoven – all seemed to recognise this to one degree or another. We find it implied by Haydn when he left a gap of nearly a decade between the six quartets of opus 20 and those of opus 33, which he described as ‘written in an entirely new way’ and articulated by Beethoven when following the revision of his opus 18, no 1 he wrote to a friend, ‘only now do I know how to write proper quartets’. Some two years later Beethoven’s next step was a staggering further leap forward with the three quartets of opus 59, termed the ‘Razumovsky Quartet’s’ after the count of that name, Russian ambassador to Vienna and the commissioner of the quartets. It is not necessary to go further than the opening of the first of the trio, the Quartet in F to recognise that Beethoven has entered a new world barely hinted at in the opus 18 quartets. Not only is the harmony adventurous but the lyrical first motif appears not in the upper part as one would expect, but in the bass. There is already a spacious feel to the music and it is no surprise to learn the quartets of opus 59 aroused comment not only because of their length but also because of their complexity, which disturbed some of Beethoven’s contemporaries. Needless to say such challenges cause no problem to the Chiaroscuros, one of the most technically accomplished string quartets around today, who from the outset of that F- major Quartet find an affectionate lyricism that will be transformed into the supreme virtuosity with which the complex contrapuntal writing of the development is laid out. Rubato is used sparingly but to nothing like the extent it is a part of the radical approach of the Narratio Quartet, whose use of portamento has no place here. The sound picture is indeed remarkably ‘clean’, with the most full-blooded of chunky chords played with outstanding precision and regard for ensemble, while at the other end of the spectrum it encompasses a fleeting filigree delicacy. Neither is expressivity lacking, most notably in the wonderfully elegiac Adagio molto e mesto, which brings some sublime mezzo voce playing. The opening Allegro of the Quartet in E-minor, opus 59, no 2 in E minor asks for and here receives considerable agility before the Molto adagio enters into a world of profound tragedy, here unwaveringly sustained. That the Chiaroscuros are as happy with Beethoven in more unbuttoned mode can be heard in final allegro of the F-major Quartet and Allegretto of the E minor, a scherzo. Both carry the marking ‘Théme russe’ a reminder that Razumovsky had specifically asked Beethoven to include either authentic or invented Russian themes in ‘his’ quartets. As should have become clear from the foregoing, these are exceptional ‘historically informed’ performances that offer superb playing on a more modest scale than the head- on challenge the Narratio’s present to the listener. Brian Robins Tags Chamber music, Romantic Categories Recording Beethoven: Piano Trios op. 70, no. 1 “Ghost” & op. 70, no. 2 Post author By EMR2015 Post date September 23, 2026 No Comments on Beethoven: Piano Trios op. 70, no. 1 “Ghost” & op. 70, no. 2 Rautio Piano Trio70:09Resonus RES 10386 This brings the splendid Rautio Piano Trio’s survey of the Beethoven trios near to completion, leaving just the crowning glory of the ‘Archduke’ – and perhaps also the rather enigmatic so-called ‘Kakadu’ Variations – to come. Reviews of previous issues on this site can be found here and here. The new issue not only brings the two ‘middle period’ trios of op 70, no 1 in D, ‘Ghost’ and 2 in E-flat composed in 1808, but also two early piano trio movements, the Allegretto in B-flat, WoO 39, and the very brief Allegretto in E-flat, Hess 48. The latter is believed to date from around 1790 and is possibly associated with a cultural and political club in Bonn, a favourite haunt of Beethoven. With its guileless loping theme, it is of relatively little significance, but WoO 39 is a genuine bon bouche. Written in 1812, it was a gift for Maximiliane, the young daughter of Beethoven’s friend Antonie Brentano, apparently to encourage her progress on the piano. It is a piece of charm and innocence, with a particularly beguiling folksy secondary idea, played here with an agreeable light touch and some persuasive hints of rubato, while the greater intensity and twists and turns of the later stages are ideally captured. The two trios of op 70, dedicated to the Countess Erdödy, cover rather more familiar ground, of course, particularly in the case of the ‘Ghost’ Trio. The CD’s notes concentrate near totally on the fascinating personal reflections on the D-major Trio of the Rautio’s pianist, Jan Rautio, who reminds us that its central Largo assai gained the trio its nickname from Beethoven’s pupil Carl Czerny long after Beethoven’s death. For Czerny, the spectral elements of the movement reminded him of the first appearance of the Ghost in Hamlet, while Rautio, noting the trios of op 70 were composed in Heiligenstadt, finds in this darkly disturbing movement psychological elements deriving from the famous Heiligenstadt Testament of 1802. But this vividly evocative movement will arouse many different emotions and reactions. It is salient to note, as indeed Rautio does, that the outer movements of the trio inspire quite a different image, their exuberance ideally suited to the wonderfully uninhibited playing the Rautios have captured throughout the series, the recognition that there is as much good humour and spirited life in Beethoven’s music as there is deep spirituality or tragedy. The development of the opening Allegro of the ‘Ghost’ here inspires a contrapuntal whirlwind played with breathtaking virtuosity, while the recapitulation brings some wonderfully fleet playing from Rautio and a few magically telling bars of repose in the coda. Opus 70, no 2 is an expansive work in the more usual four movements that opens with a mysterious imitative slow passage from which the bright Allegro emerges, a movement again notable for some sparkling piano work and the excellent sense of balance that has been another of the primary features of the Rautio’s performances. The variations of the succeeding Allegretto have a theme redolent of a folk dance of great charm, their somewhat halting progress expressed with playfully engaging wit. The exuberant final Allegro demands and receives virtuoso playing with a sense of fun never far away. So this beautifully recorded CD marks another distinctive chapter in the Rautio Piano Trios survey. There is a small caveat in that it would have been helpful to listeners to have something in the notes on the other trios. For those interested in the instruments employed, Rautio has here moved onto a copy by Paul McNulty of a grand piano by Conrad Graf dating from 1819. As recorded here, it has an agreeable sonority across its range, with a not dissimilar silvery texture in the upper range to the copy of the 1805 Walter employed on the first two discs. I understand that the final issue in the series is due in March 2027. It will mark the completion of a very notable and distinctive series. Brian Robins Tags Chamber music, Romantic Categories Recording Haydn 2032: No. 19 Trauer Post author By EMR2015 Post date September 8, 2026 No Comments on Haydn 2032: No. 19 Trauer Il Giardino Armonico, conducted by Giovanni Antonini78:22Alpha Classics 1101 One of several fascinating aspects of Giovanni Antonini’s marvellous series of Haydn symphonies is the unexpected nature of many of the small bonus pieces he includes. The present release provides a particularly striking example, with two of Haydn’s so-called ‘Sturm und Drang’ symphonies juxtaposed with the brief stillness of Arvo Pärt’s Da pacem Domine, dedicated to the victims of the Madrid railway station terrorist attack in 2004, and Samuel Scheidt’s deeply sonorous Paduana Dolorosa à 4, published in 1621, at the start of the devastating Thirty Years War. For Antonini’s reasoning behind the interposing of these pieces with the Symphonies Nos. 52 in C minor and 44 in E minor, ‘Trauer’, you will have to read his note in the CD booklet. I very much hope you will do so, for it means you are likely to have come by another addition to the series. In addition, one of Haydn’s symphonies not part of the familiar numbered collection, No. 108 in B flat, is also included. Symphonies No 44 (ca 1772) and 52 (1774) stand at the heart of the so-called ‘Sturm und Drang’ group of symphonies, works characterised by emotional extremes that, particularly in their opening movements, are expressed through jagged, angular motifs and a restless urgency that stands at the polar opposite of the misconceived (in several respects) image of Haydn as the genial ‘father of the symphony’. The E minor especially is a magnificent work, given an impressive strength and tension by its unison opening that never lets up, here in part at least because the razor-sharp playing of Il Giardino Armonico adds its own degree of intensity. This precision has, of course, been a feature of the playing of both the ensembles Antonini has employed in the cycle, and remarkably it has not been bought at the cost of affection or warmth. Those qualities are here particularly evident in the serenity of the Adagio, placed as the third movement after a display of contrapuntal wizardry in the ‘Canone in Diapason’ (i.e. at the octave). The Adagio gives the work its name (not bestowed by Haydn) and is believed to stem from the composer’s request that it be played at his own funeral, while the C minor was identified by the Italian poet Giuseppe Carpani as one of three (the others are Nos. 39 and 26 ‘Lamentatione’) composed for Holy Week and performed in the chapel at Eisenstadt. The Symphony No. 108 missed out on being included in the catalogue of Haydn’s symphonies on account of it being transmitted in some sources as a ‘partita’ rather than a symphony. It is an early work, dating from 1762 and composed as a tribute to Haydn’s first Esterházy employer, Prince Paul Anton II, who died that year. But there is nothing funereal here in a work that opens with a bright, fleet-footed Allegro before continuing to a lively, spirited Minuet followed by an Andante displaying a graceful gravity. The symphony ends with a hectic, dynamic Presto. The long, sustained chords of the Pärt and profundity of the Scheidt make an ideal foil for the dramatic intensity of ‘Sturm und Drang’ Haydn. As suggested above, the performances of all these works maintain the highest standards previously well-established in this endlessly rewarding series. Brian Robins Tags Classical, Orchestral music Categories Recording A Musical Offering Post author By EMR2015 Post date September 4, 2026 No Comments on A Musical Offering 1747 – Bach’s journey to PotsdamLe Caravansérail67:21Ramée RAM2508 BEWARE: this interesting and elegantly prepared CD is not another recording of The Musical Offering, but a musical offering by the trio Le Caravansérail, traverso, violin and harpsichord, presented in a card case illustrated by the elements of an 18th-century travelling picnic satchel. The trio plays a number of works, including parts of BWV 1079 – the Ricercar a 3, the Sonata and the Canon perpetuus super thema Regium – and also a plausible version of BVW 1032, here reconstructed by Frank Theuns from its mutilated state and transposed to G minor. By C.P.E there is a sonata (Wq 143) and a Trio a Cembalo obligato e Violino (Wq 72), and by Wilhelm Friedemann a trio a 2 Flauti e Cembalo (Fk 49). Of the instruments, listed with their makers and the originals they are made after, the actual period survivor is Sophie Gent’s violin, a Jacob Stainer of 1676. The numbers that form the programme are strung together round the concept of the arduous journey to Potsdam, at the end of which Johann Sebastian was thrust into the King’s presence to perform at once, only later to complete his fully worked and majestic contrapuntal chef-d’oeuvre. Writing the liner notes, Frank Theuns makes a good case for displaying the talents of the better-known of Bach’s family members together as a kind of holiday photograph album. The group’s style of performance is French orientated, with lovely languid slow movements and vivid notes inégales, and swaying, dance-inspired faster movements of the sons’ galant style. Balance is good, and the decision not to use a string bass with the resonant bass register of the harpsichord is vindicated here. Whether you will feel moved to buy this CD, I am not sure: the performance has merits, and the concept is worthwhile, but I am not sure I will return to it often. It is the kind of programme you would delight in finding on offer at a late evening recital in a busy festival. David Stancliffe Tags Baroque, Chamber music Categories Recording Bach: French Suites BWV812–817 Post author By EMR2015 Post date September 4, 2026 1 Comment on Bach: French Suites BWV812–817 Andrew Arthur harpsichord108:51 (2 CDs in a single case)Resonus Inventa INV1021 The French Suites on this pair of CDs follow the release of the Clavier concertos Andrew Arthur made with a small string band led by Theresa Caudle under the aegis of the Hanover Band that I much enjoyed and reviewed for the EMR in 2022 and 23. Here he plays BWV 812, 814 and 817 on a double manual by Andrew Garlick of 2009 after a Goujon in the Paris Conservatoire of 1749 and is the instrument in Trinity Hall, Cambridge, where Andrew Arthur is a fellow; while BWV 815, 813 and 816 are played on an instrument by Keith Hill after a Taskin of 1769 in the Russell Collection at Edinburgh University. Both instruments are tuned in Neidhardt “fur ein grosse Stadt” of 1724 at A=415 Hz. They are a nicely balanced pair, and Arthur’s neat and lyrical playing makes them sing. The one by Keith Hill has an especially nutty character, reminding me of the tone of an oboe da caccia. These are not performances that are full of clanging post-Wanda Landowska neo-Baroquery effects, but something much more subtle, like the use of the lute stop in Menuet of 814 with a gentler 8’ for the Trio. But almost more significant than the eloquent performances are Arthur’s fascinating notes on pages 8 – 11 of the booklet on sources and performance decisions. He traces the material from its first version in the 1722 Clavier-Büchlein for Anna Magdalena through to its sole surviving autograph made by Johann Christoph Altnickol which contains the later composed sixth suite, finished no later than 1725. Then there are the multiple versions made by pupils and other copyists, all of which Arthur has studied. All this gives the performer today a challenge about which version to use and in which order to play the movements in each suite. Arthur lists the many manuscript sources, and invites to listener to appreciate his own choices in the performances he gives us. The context of his choices, underlined by the venue for this recording – Trinity Hall’s small-scale chapel – is one of comparative domesticity rather than the grand bravura performances of some more ‘soloistic’ versions of the French Suites available, and I very much warmed to this studied and studious version. You will learn much, and will not tire of listening to them repeatedly. David Stancliffe Tags Baroque, Keyboard music Categories Recording Sturm und Drang 4 Post author By EMR2015 Post date August 28, 2026 No Comments on Sturm und Drang 4 Alexandra Lowe soprano, The Mozartists, conducted by Ian Page73:44Signum SIGCD1012 This invaluable series – reviews of vols 2 and 3 can be read on this site – continues with a group of works that have a loose association with the literary movement founded on Goethe’s The Sorrows of Young Werther (1774). It is however not too reiterative to stress again that there are no identifiable links between the music associated with ‘Sturm und Drang’ (‘storm and stress’) and the literary movement most famously associated with Goethe’s famous proto-Romantic novel. Neither are there cohesive connections between the music identified with the term. Notwithstanding there are general characteristics that allow the term to be applied to certain works, among them the use of minor keys, dramatic, fiery outbursts and the undisguised expression of deeply-felt emotion. This unrestrained intensity of emotional outpouring can be heard from the outset of one of the earliest works on the present disc, Haydn’s Symphony No 45 in F sharp minor, ‘Farewell’ (1772). Here that fieriness is announced at a finely-judged tempo enhanced by the Mozartists, whose technically assured and idiomatic playing is indeed one of the distinguishing features not just of the present disc but of the series as a whole. ‘The Farewell’ is of course one of the better-known of the middle-period Haydn symphonies, owing its fame largely to the story of the composer’s none-too-subtle hint to his employer Prince Esterházy that his musicians did not want the long summer holiday at Esterháza to be further extended and wished to go back to Eisenstadt to their wives and families. Tommaso Traetta’s Antigona dates from the same year and is the dramma per musica that marked the start of the revival of interest in his music, having been recorded complete by Christophe Rousset as long ago as 2000 following a concert performance at the Beaune Festival. First given at the court of Catherine the Great in St Petersburg, it has a libretto by Marco Coltelini based on Sophocles’s great tragedy and shows the influence of the ongoing operatic reforms and French tragédie lyrique. The recitative and aria sung by Antigona near the start of Act 2 is one of the most exceptional passages. Antigona has come with her serving women to cremate her murdered brother Polinices. The superb accompagnato and aria ‘Ombra cara’/’Io resto sempre’ are darkly passionate and here projected with good diction and dramatic intensity by soprano Alexandra Lowe, though some may find her vibrato troublesome at times. But she manages a splendid trill at the cadence of the repeat, for me as regular readers will know, a saving grace for any singer! With the exception of a lack of control in the upper register at odd moments, Lowe also does very well by the aria di furia ‘Vorrei punirti’, hurled at her fiancé Count Belfiore by the aristocratic Arminda in Mozart’s La finta giardiniera (Munich, 1775), a so-called dramma giocoso featuring comic, semi-serious and serious characters. But Lowe’s finest moment on the CD arguably comes not in singing but the spoken word. This is an extract from the Bohemian Georg Anton Benda’s melodrama Medea, written for a famous actress Sophie Seyler and first given in Leipzig in 1775. Melodrama, a dramatic work or part of one in which the spoken word is set within a musical context, fascinated Mozart when he heard Medea in Mannheim, but although he was obviously aware of the dramatic possibilities, he never himself used it apart from in parts of the abandoned Zaide of 1779-80. The passage here involves the terrifying climax of the adaptation of Euripides drama in which the thwarted sorceress Medea expresses her last thoughts and actions set against Benda’s highly dramatic score. Alexandra Lowe’s finely-nuanced performance is electrifyingly powerful, sweeping all before her. Finally, the splendid three-movement Symphony in C minor by Frankfurt-born Joseph Martin Kraus, composed in Vienna in 1783, apparently dedicated to Haydn and the latest music in the programme. The work is archetypal Sturm und Drang, perhaps nowhere more remarkably so than in the slow Larghetto that precedes the main opening Allegro. Here the dissonant opening on high strings seems to be a prelude to some as yet unknown tragedy, the threat of which hangs over the superbly sustained brooding mood achieved by the playing of the Mozartists under Ian Page. Page’s total empathy with the music is indeed the single most distinguished feature of the performances both here and in earlier discs of a series further graced by his scholarly notes. And there are still three more projected CDs to come. They cannot do so soon enough! Brian Robins Tags Classical, Orchestral music, Vocal music Categories Recording Orlando Gibbons 400 Post author By EMR2015 Post date August 17, 2026 No Comments on Orlando Gibbons 400 An English Keyboard LegacyFriederike Chylek harpsichord48:27Resonus Inventa INV1022 Arguably the outstanding interpreter of Byrd’s keyboard music from her generation, Friederike Chylek turns her attention to Byrd’s younger Chapel Royal colleague (and possible though undocumented pupil) Orlando Gibbons, the quatercentenary of whose death occurred last year. To present Gibbons’ music in contemporary perspective, she includes a few works by Byrd himself, and by Byrd’s documented pupil John Bull, the date of whose birth fell between the other two. Ms Chylek’s strengths are a wonderful grasp of melodic line, an impeccable sense of momentum, and superb clarity of contrapuntal discourse. It will come as no surprise to those aware of her other recordings that many of her interpretations on this disc are the best, or equal the best, of the works under consideration. Critics and musicologists (apart from the late John Harley) seem inhibited about celebrating and revelling in exotic or well-constructed chords in Tudor music. Gibbons’ Fantasia in A minor “in four parts” is adorned by the composer with several, and Ms Chylek plays these perfectly, with every note audible and immaculately balanced. I cannot think of a better version on disc, nor of the famous Pavan and Galliard for Lord Salisbury. The other works by Gibbons included on this disc are The Italian Ground, Galliard in C major (MB20/25), Fantasia in D minor (MB20/8), Ground in A minor (MB29/26), and The Queen’s Command. I was particularly interested to hear Ms Chylek’s take on Byrd’s Pavan and Galliard for Philippa Tregian. Besides being one of the greatest pairings of this sort in the entire repertory, the second strain, in its understated way, paradoxically reaches a profundity achieved by only the most gifted composers and, particularly in the varied repeat, delves where nobody had been before in keyboard music. Playing this passage requires the utmost clarity of line and steadiness of tempo. Of previous recordings, only Colin Booth on his all-Byrd The Melodious Birde matches Ms Chylek’s sensitivity to Byrd’s intense introspection. She also plays two sets of folksong variations by Byrd. Callino casturame is again the equal of any other recording and has a good claim to be the best available, bringing out all that is delightful in Byrd’s fresh textures and affectionately creative ruminations on the original theme. John come kiss me now is a rite of passage for Byrd recitalists: a longer work that requires a sense of ebb and flow while controlling the overall shape, plus a dazzling technique to cope with Byrd’s teeming enjambment across sections later in the work. Suffice to say Ms Chylek copes with all this capably. Bull is represented by just two pieces. Predictably but appropriately, Bull’s Goodnight closes the album. The other piece is his Country Dance and this leads me to my one reservation about this disc. This seems to be the only available recording of the work, and is therefore an excellent choice. (On all the available evidence we can securely ignore Thurston Dart’s typically whimsical protestation over the attribution of this piece to Bull.) However, the running time for the entire record is only 48’27. I fully understand that constraints of time and/or money might well be in play here, but another half hour of music could have been accommodated. It would have been wonderful to hear Ms Chylek playing Gibbons’ heartfelt Pavan in d minor (MB20/16) and – even on a disc celebrating Gibbons – a couple of Byrd’s pavan and galliard pairings from left field, such as BK 16 (Dowland would have given his right arm for the theme opening the Galliard!) or the majestic and sonorous BK 76-77, glory which only survives in a playable form by the skin of its teeth and so should be cherished all the more. That said, such is the concentration of excellence on this disc – in Ms Chylek’s playing and in the music itself – that any reservations remain just that and are not complaints. Indeed, I warmly recommend it. Richard Turbet Tags Baroque, Keyboard music, Renaissance Posts pagination ← Newer Posts1 2 … 218 Older Posts → © 2026 early music review Powered by WordPress To the top ↑ Up ↑engben-GB1794631922https://earlymusicreview.com

اپنی سائٹ میں ترمیم کریں؟

کیا کر رہے ہو؟